sitemap

RSS地图

收藏本站

设为首页

Oracle研究中心

当前位置:Oracle研究中心 > 故障案例 >

Oracle数据库8i升级到9i出现ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]

时间:2016-03-22 22:45   来源:惜分飞   作者:惜分飞   点击:

天萃荷净

一个朋友Oracle数据库版本从8i升级到9i后,出现ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]错误

 

Oracle数据库alert日志文件报错信息:

Mon Jul 16 12:21:54 2012
Errors in file /oracle/admin/ora8/udump/ora8_ora_8938.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [pevm_MOVC_i()+18] [SIGSEGV]
[Address not mapped to object] [0x7] [] []

Oracle数据库跟踪trace文件信息如下:

--版本平台信息
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/product/9.2.0
System name:	Linux
Node name:	localhost.localdomain
Release:	2.6.18-194.el5PAE
Version:	#1 SMP Tue Mar 16 22:00:21 EDT 2010
Machine:	i686
Instance name: ora8
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 15
Unix process pid: 8938, image: oracle@localhost.localdomain (TNS V1-V3)

--trace信息
*** 2012-07-16 12:21:54.399
*** SESSION ID:(12.6) 2012-07-16 12:21:54.399
Exception signal: 11 (SIGSEGV), code: 1 (Address not mapped to object), 
addr: 0x7, PC: [0x9bfac06, pevm_MOVC_i()+18]
Registers:
%eax: 0x00000000 %ebx: 0x00000025 %ecx: 0x00000000
%edx: 0xbf93bf50 %edi: 0x00000000 %esi: 0x002ff1d8
%esp: 0xbf93bc28 %ebp: 0xbf93bc60 %eip: 0x09bfac06
%efl: 0x00010296
  pevm_MOVC_i()+6 (0x9bfabfa) mov %edi,0xffffffcc(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+9 (0x9bfabfd) mov %esi,0xffffffd0(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+12 (0x9bfac00) mov %ebx,0xffffffc8(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+15 (0x9bfac03) mov 0x14(%ebp),%eax
> pevm_MOVC_i()+18 (0x9bfac06) movb 0x7(%eax),%dl
  pevm_MOVC_i()+21 (0x9bfac09) mov $0x0,0xfffffff0(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+28 (0x9bfac10) movb %dl,0xffffffe0(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+31 (0x9bfac13) movb %dl,0xffffffe0(%ebp)
  pevm_MOVC_i()+34 (0x9bfac16) cmpb $0x1,%dl
*** 2012-07-16 12:21:54.407
ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [pevm_MOVC_i()+18] [SIGSEGV]
[Address not mapped to object] [0x7] [] []
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling              call     entry                argument values in hex      
location             type     point                (? means dubious value)     
-------------------- -------- -------------------- ----------------------------
ksedmp()+269         call     ksedst()+0           1 ? 0 ? 0 ? 1 ? 64252C31 ?
                                                   6666006C ?
ssexhd()+1108        call     ksedmp()+0           3 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ?
pevm_MOVC_i()+18     signal   ssexhd()+0           B ? BF93B8BC ? BF93B93C ?
pfrrun()+8458        call     pevm_MOVC_i()+0      2FF19C ? 16 ? BE14650 ? 0 ?
pricar()+1277        call     pfrrun()+0           2FF19C ? 1 ? BF93CCFC ?
                                                   AD638A0 ? 2DFBAC ? 0 ?
pricbr()+427         call     pricar()+0           BF93DA88 ? BF93D084 ?
                                                   9BEAE0C ? 1 ? 0 ? 98C93728 ?
prient2()+598        call     pricbr()+0           BF93DA88 ? BF93D084 ? 0 ?
prient()+1438        call     prient2()+0          BF93DA88 ? BF93D084 ? 1 ?
                                                   BF93E4E0 ? 0 ?
kkxrpc()+347         call     prient()+0           BF93DA88 ? AD638A0 ?
                                                   BF93E534 ? 38 ? 1C8C997 ? 0 ?
kporpc()+138         call     kkxrpc()+0           4C ? F ? BF93E63C ?
opiodr()+5238        call     kjushutdown()+2671   4C ? F ? BF93E63C ?
ttcpip()+2124        call     opiodr()+0           4C ? F ? BF93E63C ? 0 ?
Cannot find symbol in /lib/libc.so.6.
opitsk()+1635        call     ttcpip()+0           AD638A0 ? 4C ? BF93E63C ? 0 ?
                                                   BF93EF14 ? BF93EF10 ?
opiino()+602         call     opitsk()+0           0 ? 0 ? AD638A0 ? BE01DE0 ?
                                                   103 ? 0 ?
opiodr()+5238        call     kjushutdown()+2671   3C ? 4 ? BF9402E0 ?
opidrv()+517         call     opiodr()+0           3C ? 4 ? BF9402E0 ? 0 ?
sou2o()+25           call     opidrv()+0           3C ? 4 ? BF9402E0 ?
main()+182           call     sou2o()+0            BF9402C4 ? 3C ? 4 ?
                                                   BF9402E0 ? 0 ? 0 ?
00125E9C             call     main()+0             2 ? BF940384 ? BF940390 ?
                                                   88A810 ? 0 ? 1 ?
 
---------------------Binary Stack Dump ---------------------


Oracle数据库操作系统进程信息:

Process global information:
 process: 0x962ba0b8, call: 0x96342cd8, xact: (nil), 
   curses: 0x962e4070, usrses: 0x962e4070
  ----------------------------------------
  SO: 0x962ba0b8, type: 2, owner: (nil), flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
  (process) Oracle pid=15, calls cur/top: 0x96342cd8/0x96342cd8, flag: (0) -
            int error: 0, call error: 0, sess error: 0, txn error 0
  (post info) last post received: 196 0 4
              last post received-location: kslpsr
              last process to post me: 962b7828 1 6
              last post sent: 0 0 15
              last post sent-location: ksasnd
              last process posted by me: 962b7828 1 6
    (latch info) wait_event=0 bits=0
    Process Group: DEFAULT, pseudo proc: 0x962d9444
    O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 8938
    OSD pid info: Unix process pid: 8938, image: 
                    oracle@localhost.localdomain (TNS V1-V3)
    ----------------------------------------
    SO: 0x962e4070, type: 4, owner: 0x962ba0b8, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
    (session) trans: (nil), creator: 0x962ba0b8, flag: (8000041) USR/- BSY/-/-
              DID: 0001-000F-00000004, short-term DID: 0000-0000-00000000
              txn branch: (nil)
              oct: 0, prv: 0, sql: (nil), psql: 0x98c3b858, user: 95/DDDD
    O/S info: user: mis, term: LANDERSVR3, 
                                  ospid: 7904:3012, machine: XANDER\LANDERSVR3
              program: c:\orant\bin\f50run32.exe c:\forms\bas9010.fmx
    application name: c:\orant\bin\f50run32.exe c:\forms\bas9010.fmx, hash value=0
    last wait for 'db file sequential read' blocking sess=0x0 seq=1277 wait_time=11
                file#=1, block#=21b, blocks=1

1.该用户程序是从8i升级到9i之后产生该错误
2.报错的访问程序是FORM 5

    -------------------解决方案---------------------

查询MOS[ID 273411.1]发现是因为FORM 5和9i不兼容导致该错误,ORACLE未给出解决方案,言外之意,如果FORM不能升级,那就只能把ORACLE重新降级到8i.

    -------------------温馨提示---------------------

在做oracle数据库升级前,需要实现进行评估,测试,如果是oracle相关软件和oracle数据库结合紧密,升级前最好需要和ORACLE技术人员确认是否兼容。

本文由大师惜分飞分享,Oracle研究中心www.oracleplus.net,转载请尽量保留本站网址。


--------------------------------------ORACLE-DBA----------------------------------------

最权威、专业的Oracle案例资源汇总之Oracle数据库8i升级到9i出现ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]

本文由大师惜分飞原创分享,网址:http://www.oracleplus.net/arch/2.html

Oracle研究中心

关键词:

Oracle数据库升级报错

ORA-07445[pevm_MOVC_i()+18]

8i升级到9i出现ORA-07445